Maybe it is a peanut butter mandate wrapped in a chocolate tax. First the question should have been asked by the Supreme Court on how the current administration planned on defending Obama Care. First is was a mandate then it was a tax. Were they going to defend it as a mandate (peanut butter) or a tax (chocolate). Not one judge should have voted until that was settled first. I don't believe anyone even thought this thing out until the Court's decision was made.
I think judge Roberts got confused at were he was and what he was supposed to be doing. Maybe he had watched too many episodes of Catdog. Let's help him out shall we? I will show you what Obama Care really is.
Thanks again Supreme Court for taking more of our personal property away. Now don't try and tell me that money isn't personal property because it is. Nothing is more personal to people than their money.
Oh by the way Judge Roberts bad legislation and bad judicial decisions have consequences too, they are called revolutions.
Leon
Images: Yahoo Images
Bad Government Policy: Reid, Pelosi, and Obama
Lack of clear judgement: The Supreme Court (Polit Bureau) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politburo
Really enjoying the blog!
ReplyDelete